Jump to HeaderJump to Main ContentJump to Footer
Michigan State University
MSUTODAY
  • Browse Stories By

    Topics

    Explore stories by subject area

    • Arts and Culture
    • Business and Economy
    • Climate and Environment
    • Education and Learning
    • Engineering, Science and Technology
    • Government and Society
    • Health and Medicine
    • Media and Communications
    • MSU Leadership and Impact
    • Sports and Recreation
    • Student and Campus Experience
    View All Stories

    Collections

    Curated story series

    • Turfgrass
    • Ask the Expert
    • Big Ideas
    • Climate solutions
    • Water at MSU
    • Mobility
    • Spartan Perspectives
    • Student views
    • Graduate voices
    • Faculty voices
    View All Collections

    Featured

    Editor's picks

    • The Spartans behind your favorite Michigan golf courses

      July 22, 2026

      The Spartans behind your favorite Michigan golf courses

    • MSU in the 1990s: 10 Spartan milestones

      July 14, 2026

      MSU in the 1990s: 10 Spartan milestones

MSUTODAY
  • Browse Stories By

< Browse Stories By

Topics

Explore stories by subject area

  • Arts and Culture
  • Business and Economy
  • Climate and Environment
  • Education and Learning
  • Engineering, Science and Technology
  • Government and Society
  • Health and Medicine
  • Media and Communications
  • MSU Leadership and Impact
  • Sports and Recreation
  • Student and Campus Experience
  • View All Stories

Collections

Curated story series

  • Turfgrass
  • Ask the Expert
  • Big Ideas
  • Climate solutions
  • Water at MSU
  • Mobility
  • Spartan Perspectives
  • Student views
  • Graduate voices
  • Faculty voices
  • View All Collections

Featured

Editor's picks

  • The Spartans behind your favorite Michigan golf courses

    July 22, 2026

    The Spartans behind your favorite Michigan golf courses

  • MSU in the 1990s: 10 Spartan milestones

    July 14, 2026

    MSU in the 1990s: 10 Spartan milestones

  • For Media
  • Experts
  • Releases and Statements
  • Sign Up
  • Update Information

Resources

  • A to Z Index
  • Find People
  • Maps
  • Email
  • Student Information System (SIS)
  • D2L
  • Libraries
  • Tech Support
  • MSU Misconduct Hotline
  • Social Media Directory
  • Events Calendar
  • For Media
Michigan State University
MSUToday
  • For Media
  • Experts
  • Releases and Statements
  • Sign Up
  • Update Information
Climate and Environment

Jan. 14, 2022

Detailing lake trout reproductive response to sea lamprey parasitism

By: Cameron Rudolph
Cheryl Murphy

Newly published research from MSU scientists details the reproductive response of two types of Michigan lake trout found in Lake Superior — siscowets and leans — to sea lamprey parasitism, and the results coincide with a long-held evolutionary theory.

The life history theory was developed in the 1950s in an attempt to explain how natural selection has molded organisms’ behavior, lifespan and reproduction.

Tyler Firkus, a doctoral student in the MSU Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, said that while the theory gives predictions about how organisms may react to parasitism, few studies have provided empirical evidence.

Firkus works in the lab of Cheryl Murphy, and both are co-authors of a recently published paper in the journal Integrative and Comparative Biology.

Before starting laboratory trials, the team developed a life history conceptual model based on known information about siscowets and leans, two lake trout ecomorphs of the same species.

Leans favor shallow, warmer water and grow more quickly than siscowets, which are found in deep, cold water and live longer than leans. Researchers hypothesized that leans would ramp up reproductive efforts in response to sea lamprey parasitism due to their shorter lifespans, while siscowets would favor energy storage and a long-term approach to successful reproduction.

“In the wild, siscowets display a higher rate of observed sea lamprey parasitism, which suggests a greater number of them survive the experience than leans,” Firkus said. “Siscowets also don’t show altered growth trajectories as a result of sea lamprey parasitism, showing they are able to cope better.”

To spawn or not to spawn?

For the study, researchers used 11- to 12-year-old leans and siscowets raised from eggs collected from wild adults in Lake Superior. Sea lamprey were gathered by commercial fishing operations in Lake Superior and Lake Huron, actively attached to a host.

Scientists placed individual siscowets or leans into a tank with one sea lamprey and recorded the duration of attachment. Sea lamprey were allowed to feed for no longer than four days, which prevented a lethal event. Other individual fish were placed in tanks with no sea lamprey to act as a control.

Tyler Firkus

Once each trial was complete, the lake trout’s fat content, length and weight were measured, and the attachment site was graded for severity of the wound. The lake trout were then moved back to their regular tanks to heal.

Since spawning typically occurs for both siscowets and leans in early October, researchers monitored each fish from mid-September to early November following parasitism. The volume of eggs or milt — the sperm-containing fluid — was measured for each lake trout, and those that did not produce eggs or milt were considered to have skipped spawning.

“Leans produced more eggs than siscowets per gram of body weight, regardless of parasitism status,” Murphy said. “All female leans produced eggs as well, which tells us that one of their responses is to reproduce to ensure the next generation.”

Conversely, more than half of siscowets avoided spawning altogether, and those with more severe wounds skipped spawning at an even higher rate — 78%.  Since they live longer, Murphy said, siscowets have more opportunities to spawn. After parasitism, their responses focus on energy storage and survival, improving the likelihood of successful reproduction in the future.

For lean males, parasitism did not have an effect on milt concentration. But in male siscowets, milt concentration decreased, as researchers expected.

“This is the first study we’re aware of that provides empirical evidence of life history tradeoffs in sea lamprey parasitism,” Firkus said.

In addition to Firkus and Murphy, partners on the project were Rick Goetz, a research physiologist at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and the Great Lakes Water Institute, and Gregory Fischer, the facilities manager at the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point’s Northern Aquaculture Demonstration Facility.

A bite mark from a sea lamprey on a lake trout. On the tag,

More precise sea lamprey management

A second paper, published in the Journal of Great Lakes Research, expands on the initial project to examine the rate of sea lamprey parasitism on lake trout.

Firkus noted that the current visual examination procedure used to record sea lamprey wounds is unreliable. As attachment marks heal over time, it becomes difficult to identify and classify them with high accuracy. Additionally, sea lamprey sometimes attach to areas that don’t leave noticeable traces, such as the fins or gills.

To paint a clearer picture of the problem, researchers needed a biological marker unique to parasitism, and Murphy’s team has found it in blood.

Blood samples and wounding descriptions were taken from siscowets in the first experiment, both immediately following parasitism and again after seven months. This was compared to non-parasitized control fish.

For parasitized lake trout, scientists discovered that three functional classes of proteins were affected, including blood coagulation, immune response and lipid transport. The team identified an anticoagulant response in fish that experienced severe wounds, and some proteins did not fully recover in the seven-month timeframe. Less severely wounded lake trout showed an intermediate response.

These results suggest that blood coagulation could be a reliable indicator of sea lamprey attacks and their severity, and can persist long after parasitism when healing has progressed.

Murphy said that quantifying the blood clotting response could be a cost-effective way to evaluate parasitism rates when combined with wound observation. The next step is to further validate these findings when tested against a variety of potential environmental scenarios.

“This can help fisheries managers make important sea lamprey management decisions because it gives them a more accurate idea of parasitism rate,” Murphy said. “Wound identification and assessment is an important tool, but we think using these biomarkers can supplement that data.”

Partners on this project included Murphy, Firkus and Goetz, as well as Sarah Alderman and Oliver Bullingham from the Department of Integrative Biology at the University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. This work was funded by the Great Lakes Fishery Commission with additional support from MSU AgBioResearch.

Climate and EnvironmentBiodiversity and WildlifeMSU ResearchMSU Leadership and Impact

Latest News

MSUToday Weekly Update

The MSUToday Weekly Update email showcases how Spartans are making a difference through academic excellence, research impact and community outreach. Get inspired by these stories of innovation, collaboration and determination. Plus, enjoy photos and videos of campus and more MSU content to help keep you connected to the Spartan community.

Sign UpUpdate My Information

Connect With Us

Visit our Facebook pageVisit our page on XVisit our Instagram pageVisit our LinkedIn pageVisit our YouTube pageVisit our TikTok page

Health and Safety

  • MSU Police and Public Safety
  • Olin Health Center
  • Counseling & Psychiatric Services (CAPS)
  • University Health and Wellbeing
  • MSU Health Care
  • Civil Rights and Title IX
  • Our Commitment
  • Center for Survivors
  • Security & Fire Safety Report
  • University Policy on Relationship Violence and Sexual Misconduct
  • Notice of Non-Discrimination, Anti-Harassment and Non-Retaliation
  • Health Care Non-Discrimination Notice

Support Services

  • Disability Resources
  • Supportive Services
  • Learning Resources

Working at MSU

  • Human Resources
  • EBS Login
  • Job Postings
  • Employee Assistance Program

Reports

  • CARES Act Funding
  • Student Achievement and Outcomes

Contact us

517-355-1855

Address

Michigan State University 426 Auditorium Road East Lansing, MI 48824

Follow Us

  • Visit our Facebook page
  • Visit our page on X
  • Visit our Instagram page
  • Visit our TikTok page
  • Visit our LinkedIn page
  • Visit our YouTube page

If you're having accessibility issues, please let us know.

Know More: Campus Safety Information and ResourcesTransparency Reporting: Budget & Salary/Compensation
  • Contact Information|
  • Site Map|
  • Privacy Statement|
  • Site Accessibility|
  • Call MSU: (517) 355-1855|
  • Visit: msu.edu|
  • Notice of Nondiscrimination|

SPARTANS WILL|© Michigan State University|