Faculty voice:

Lynne Goldstein: MSU Campus Archaeology, the future

Sept. 6, 2017

Lynne Goldstein is a professor of anthropology and director of the Campus Archaeology Program.

I created and direct the Michigan State University Campus Archaeology Program and, as of May 2018, I will be retiring from the university (although not from archaeology). The job of directing and administering MSU CAP will go to Stacey Camp, who has just arrived in East Lansing so that we can overlap for a year. MSU CAP is in very capable hands, and I am confident that the program will not only survive, but thrive.

Historic archaeology, in general, and campus archaeology, in particular, were never my primary research interests. But career paths are rarely straight, and I have found that one does best taking advantage of opportunities along the way. Given this, I have conducted excavations of several large and small historic cemeteries across the United States, and I created this campus program, which is primarily (although not exclusively) focused on historic sites.

I thought that a campus-focused program would be good for a number of reasons (beyond being able to sleep in my own bed each night), but found that there were even more reasons than I had anticipated. Here are a few of them:

  • Doing archaeology on campus raises awareness of archaeology – the fact that sites are everywhere – and that campus histories do not tell the complete story. We see ourselves as educating a large community (students, faculty staff, alumni, the general public) on the importance and value of archaeology.
  • Students and staff are more likely to get involved and excited when the sites being excavated are something they can directly relate to, allowing them to develop an appreciation for and learn more about the history of the campus is good for everyone.
  • CAP has changed attitudes and approaches of the upper administration of the campus, as well as the staff. Infrastructure Planning and Facilities employees have told us that working with CAP has definitely made their jobs more interesting.
  • Running a field school on campus (which we generally do every other year) allows students who cannot go on an expedition elsewhere the chance to learn archaeological methods and techniques. Some students cannot afford to go elsewhere; others have family commitments that constrain their opportunities.
  • In addition to training students in archaeological methods like every archaeological field school does, we also train students in archival research and to work with construction crews, staff, administration, etc. This additional training that our undergrad interns and graduate student fellows receive helps them get into graduate school and get better jobs. They have a kind of training that few others receive; they all also get extensive training in public outreach and engagement.
  • Social media has allowed a very small program to have a very large reach – we regularly engage with archaeologists and the public around the world. Students are trained in conducting such engagement, including writing regular blog posts.
  • Studying the history of higher education – particularly the land grant schools – through archaeology is fascinating, reflects larger changes in the overall culture, and is an area that has not been widely examined archaeologically. Each graduate fellow focuses their individual project on a different aspect of this history.

I feel privileged to have been able to create and direct this program, and I have to thank Michigan State University for its generous and enthusiastic support. Will I miss doing this? Of course, but it is also time to move on to the next phase. We are learning a lot about our past, with some clear possibilities for future directions if we listen.

Adapted and reused with permission from the Campus Archeology Program blog. Originally published July 28, 2017.